Romney Promises to "Fight Tooth and Nail" Medical Marijuana

Mandeville, LA - Exclusive Audio - So Romney goes out on the election trail and pounds his fist about upholding the Second Amendment, the right to keep and bear arms, but is going to "fight tooth and nail" medical marijuana? So we can trust men with weapons that can, potentially, kill people, even rooms full of people, but we CAN'T trust the same men to sit around at home and get stoned after they've defended themselves? For more check out today's free preview or grab a Founder's Pass to listen to and watch the entire show...

Audio Downloads

MP3 Version

Previous: Interview with David Simpson on Being Your Own Banker Next: Kevin Gutzman on Judge Scalia's Comments From FNS

Conversation

Add A Comment

JTWilliams on 27/07/2012 at 1:30 am said:

Only in the Republican Party! Isnt it comforting to know that, while Mitt Romney has been a political weather vein on most every major policy debate, the presumptive nominee REALLY HATES weed/potsmokers. You get the impression that if theres one thing that will be certain in a Romney administration, it will be that the drug war will continue, and victimless criminals will be prosecuted to the fullest.

Many feel a similar disgust towards Romney's vulture capitalism

Reply ↓

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Members Only Access The Founders Pass

Exclusive Content & Discounts For Members Only

See All The Benefits That Await Take The Quick Tour Join

Tweets by @TheKingDude

Was Secession A Constitutional Right? 1868 Book Concluded It Was. "It was in 1833, for the frst time in the history of the country, that it was solemnly asserted and argued, that the Constitution of the 'United States was not a compact between the States. This new doctrine simultaneously put forth, by Mr. Justice Story in his "Commentaries on the Constitution of the 'United States," and by Mr. Daniel Webster in "the greatest intellectual effort of his life," that is, in his great speech in the Senate of the I6th of February, 1833. In order to show that the Constitution is not a compact between the States, the position is assumed, that it is not a compact at all. If it be a compact, say they, then the States had a right to secede. But it is not a compact; and hence secession is treason and rebellion. The great fundamental questions, then, on which the whole controversy hinges are, first, Is the Constitution a compact? and, secondly, Is it a compact between the States?" - Albert Bledsoe, Was Secession A Constitutional Right (1868)

Most Commented

Visit The Founders Tradin' Post

Mike Church

Official XM | SIRIUS Talk Show Host News, History & Opinion For the Liberty-Minded. Heard daily on SiriusXM's Patriot ch 125, 6-9 a.m.