Mandeville, LA – Exclusive Transcript – One of the things that he notes and other people who have dealt in chemical weapons analysis keep pointing out is there’s no one running around in the kind of hardware that you would expect medics and others who would treat people who had been hit with a military-grade chemical weapon, no one is running around in those types of suits. You don’t see respirators on. It doesn’t appear as though anyone that is treating the victims is suffering secondary exposure effects. Check out today’s transcript for the rest…
Begin Mike Church Show Transcript
Mike: When I read this last night, and when I posted it in the Pile of Prep, my thought was: Wow, why isn’t an individual like this being called upon to comment on our wall-to-wall cable news coverage of America’s next great war? I read to you from the blog site of a chemical weapons expert. I found this from Serge Trifkovic, who writes at the Chronicles Magazine website. The gentleman’s name is Jean Pascal Zanders. He is a chemical weapons expert. Here is the headline at his blog site, The Trench, Recalling where science, industry and military art converged, Challenging entrenched positions, “Apparently major chemical weapons attack near Damascus reported.” He’s been updating this since the first videos of this alleged chemical weapons attack occurred.
As I am writing, disturbing news reports are coming in of a major chemical attack on the eastern eastern outskirts of Damascus (Ghouta district). According to images and film footage posted to the Internet by opponents to the al-Assad regime, many casualties, including fatalities can be seen. Supplementary visual testimony strongly indicates poisoning.
In past blog postings and commentaries I have been skeptical of CW claims, because the narrative accompanying images and film footage did not correspond with what could be seen. More importantly, a number of things one would expect to see after a CW attack were missing. Some stories as they appeared in the press just did not add up. (Recall how the initial reports on the March attack referred to chlorine, while today everybody seems to insist that it was sarin.) While there were indicators of exposure to toxicants, the evidence lacked density and there were many alternative plausible explanations for the symptoms. The United Kingdom, France, the United States and Russia supplied evidence (including analyses of samples taken out of Syria) to the United Nations in support of their request to investigate multiple allegations, but offered no concrete details to the public. Furthermore, as those samples had not been analyzed in other than national laboratories and government representatives were referring to ‘their evidence’ to buttress arguments in support of military intervention or arming the insurgents, the specter of the Iraq invasion ten years ago sufficed to retain a healthy dose of scepticism.
Mike Church Show Transcript – Charles Lee Saw The Writing On The Wall – Now America Is Despotic And Tyrannical As Predicted
The footage from the current alleged attack(s) in the Ghouta district seems to offer more convincing evidence of poisoning through asphyxiation (witness the pinkish-bluish hue on the faces of some of the fatalities). Further elements that seem to confirm exposure to toxicants are the unfocussed and rolling eyes, severe breathing difficulties, in one instance a very erect penis, and possible signs of urination or defecation on trousers (although this is difficult to say, given that the hospital floor is covered with water as staff seems to hose water over every victim). None of the victims appeared to have external wounds from blast, shrapnel or bullets.
For the rest of today’s transcript please sign up for a Founders Pass or if you’re already a member, make sure you are logged in!
Members Only Access The Founders Pass
You are missing out on crucial commentary video, audio and exclusive downloads!
See What You Are Missing Take The Tour!
OR Join Now