RSS
Merry Christmas From All Of Us At Mikechurch.com

Topic: 1913

frank niceley

Wednesday, March 6th, 2013

Interview With Senator Frank Niceley of Tennessee

Contains Exclusive: Transcript Topics: , , , , , , , , , ,

Mandeville, LA – Exclusive Transcript – You have a most intriguing and peculiar piece of legislation that actually was the brainchild of one of my organizations, the ReFounding Father Society. This is at least partially James Knox’s idea here, about how to restore some manner of federalism in the election or selection of senators, in this case in the State of Tennessee. Can you just elaborate a little on what the bill does and does not do? Check out today’s transcri….Continue

Bernanke rubs his eyes as he waits for the start of a meeting of the Financial Stability Oversight Council in Washington

Sunday, February 3rd, 2013

The Unending Devolution Started In 1913 With The Fed & The Income Tax

Contains Exclusive: Transcript Topics: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

I’ve often heard and talked about how 1913 is the pivot year. The progressives, the triumphs they were able to enjoy in 1913 with the creation of The Fed & the income tax set the stage for all the corruption and tyranny we currently experience today.….Continue

Friday, February 1st, 2013

Phil Mickelson, 1913 & The Fed

Topics: , , , , ,

Mike Church's daily Pile of Prep, chock full of woe over The Fed and other [r]epublican stories used to perform the Mike Church Show on Sirius/XM Patriot channel 125. "For all one hears about, say, 1914, 1929, 1945, 1968, 1989, and 2001, 1913 may well be the most important year in modern American—if not modern world—history. In 1913, the last three major reforms of the Progressive era were enacted: the direct election of senators; the federal ….Continue

Members Only Access The Founders Pass

Exclusive Content & Discounts For Members Only

Benjamin Franklin Would

See All The Benefits That Await Take The Quick Tour Join

"It may seem to many readers that as I have elaborated my initial hypothesis I have step by step deprived myself of very nearly all possible argumentative allies. But is not just this required by the hypothesis itself? For if the hypothesis is true, it will necessarily appear implausible, since one way of stating part of the hypothesis is precisely to assert that we are in a condition which almost nobody recognizes and which perhaps nobody at all can recognize fully. If my hypothesis appeared initially plausible. it would certainly be false. And at least if even to entertain this hypothesis puts me into an antagonistic stance. it is a very different antagonistic stance from that of, for example, modern radicalism. For the modern radical is as confident in the moral expression of his stances and consequently in the assertive uses of the rhetoric of morality as any conservative has ever been. Whatever else he denounces in our culture he is certain that it still possesses the moral resources which he requires in order to denounce it. Everything else may be, in his eyes, in disorder; but the language of morality is in order. just as it is. That he too may be being betrayed by the very language he uses is not a thought available to him."  - Alastair MacIntyre

The Following Headlines Provided by NewsMax.com

Visit The Founders Tradin' Post