Streaming: Listen Now!

Live Daily At 8AM CST. Click the button above to listen via the Founders Player!

RSS

Mike Church

Official Veritas Radio Network Talk Show Host News, History & Opinion For The Faith & Liberty-MindedHeard Daily on CRUSADE @ 8am CST

Topic: aristotle

Monday, October 12th, 2015

Scientists Ordered To Become Atheists, Christians Ordered To Become Scientists

Contains Exclusive: Transcript Topics: , , , , , , , ,

  Mandeville, LA – Exclusive Transcript – "For those of you that are doubting Thomases or doubting Tinas out there, where do we get the word or the term “soul”?  If we were to ask a Roman around the time of our Lord, at the time of Christ before there were gospels written or printed, they used, to describe a soul, the term animas.  When you say someone is animated, you’re saying they’re full of soul, you would be classically anyways."  Check out today’s t….Continue

Jurassic_Park

Wednesday, April 22nd, 2015

Jurassic Arrogance

Contains Exclusive: Transcript Topics: , , , , , , , , ,

What We Can Learn From God Talk In Jurassic Park? Mandeville, LA – Exclusive Transcript – "Dr. Michael Crichton was a brilliant critical thinker.  I’m not sure of his religious affiliations, but it seems to me that the ethical questions that he asks in his books are the same ethical questions that Christians have been asking since our Lord walked the earth.  Dr. Crichton’s work is just filled with admonitions about: Look, if you think y….Continue

livingston banner

Tuesday, February 18th, 2014

Secession Talk: Interview with Professor Donald Livingston Part 2

Contains Exclusive: Transcript Topics: , , , , , , , , ,

This is part two of Mike's interview with Donald Livingston on Secession and Rethinking the American Union.….Continue

Upcoming Events

There are no upcoming events at this time.

Members Only Access The Founders Pass

Exclusive Content & Discounts For Members Only

Benjamin Franklin Would

See All The Benefits That Await Take The Quick Tour Join

"It may seem to many readers that as I have elaborated my initial hypothesis I have step by step deprived myself of very nearly all possible argumentative allies. But is not just this required by the hypothesis itself? For if the hypothesis is true, it will necessarily appear implausible, since one way of stating part of the hypothesis is precisely to assert that we are in a condition which almost nobody recognizes and which perhaps nobody at all can recognize fully. If my hypothesis appeared initially plausible. it would certainly be false. And at least if even to entertain this hypothesis puts me into an antagonistic stance. it is a very different antagonistic stance from that of, for example, modern radicalism. For the modern radical is as confident in the moral expression of his stances and consequently in the assertive uses of the rhetoric of morality as any conservative has ever been. Whatever else he denounces in our culture he is certain that it still possesses the moral resources which he requires in order to denounce it. Everything else may be, in his eyes, in disorder; but the language of morality is in order. just as it is. That he too may be being betrayed by the very language he uses is not a thought available to him."  - Alastair MacIntyre