Citizen Alert: Mikechurch.com is free from non relevant promotions. Zero!
Instead we are choosing to focus on what truly matters: Practicing the art of [r]epublican Self-Governance.
Whatever happened to the vaunted, high brow, British culture? It was savagely corrupted and tolerates tragedies today it could not imagine 2 generations ago "Girls in outer space with lasers will prevail" - the legacy in letters of Gore Vidal to Bill Kaufmann Pat Buchanan: Time to come home from the Middle & Near East The filmmaker of the latest "we hate the prophet & his religion" movie is questioned about his movie-is this what we want in the "war on terror"!? Tom Wo….Continue
Members Only Access The Founders Pass
Exclusive Content & Discounts For Members Only
See All The Benefits That Await Take The Quick Tour Join
Introducing "The Daily [r]epublican"!
Was Secession A Constitutional Right? 1868 Book Concluded It Was. "It was in 1833, for the frst time in the history of the country, that it was solemnly asserted and argued, that the Constitution of the 'United States was not a compact between the States. This new doctrine simultaneously put forth, by Mr. Justice Story in his "Commentaries on the Constitution of the 'United States," and by Mr. Daniel Webster in "the greatest intellectual effort of his life," that is, in his great speech in the Senate of the I6th of February, 1833. In order to show that the Constitution is not a compact between the States, the position is assumed, that it is not a compact at all. If it be a compact, say they, then the States had a right to secede. But it is not a compact; and hence secession is treason and rebellion. The great fundamental questions, then, on which the whole controversy hinges are, first, Is the Constitution a compact? and, secondly, Is it a compact between the States?" - Albert Bledsoe, Was Secession A Constitutional Right (1868)
Most Commented