Citizen Alert: Mikechurch.com is free from non relevant promotions. Zero!
Instead we are choosing to focus on what truly matters: Practicing the art of [r]epublican Self-Governance.

Mandeville, LA - Exclusive Transcript - “Dance style sparks controversy in East Lyme” I say why the bother, East Lyme? Let them grind. Kids are going to do it anyways. Let them do it. What’s the harm? Come on, you old geezer. You can tag the grinders as the future single parents. You can tag the grinders as the future bringers in the world of the next generation of bastards that some taxpaying generation will have to pay for th….Continue
Members Only Access The Founders Pass
Exclusive Content & Discounts For Members Only
See All The Benefits That Await Take The Quick Tour Join
Introducing "The Daily [r]epublican"!
Was Secession A Constitutional Right? 1868 Book Concluded It Was. "It was in 1833, for the frst time in the history of the country, that it was solemnly asserted and argued, that the Constitution of the 'United States was not a compact between the States. This new doctrine simultaneously put forth, by Mr. Justice Story in his "Commentaries on the Constitution of the 'United States," and by Mr. Daniel Webster in "the greatest intellectual effort of his life," that is, in his great speech in the Senate of the I6th of February, 1833. In order to show that the Constitution is not a compact between the States, the position is assumed, that it is not a compact at all. If it be a compact, say they, then the States had a right to secede. But it is not a compact; and hence secession is treason and rebellion. The great fundamental questions, then, on which the whole controversy hinges are, first, Is the Constitution a compact? and, secondly, Is it a compact between the States?" - Albert Bledsoe, Was Secession A Constitutional Right (1868)
Most Commented