RSS

Mike Church

Official Talk Show Host News, History & Opinion For The Liberty-MindedHeard Daily on SiriusXM's Patriot ch 125, 6-9 am

Topic: Federalist No 61

law books

Friday, March 1st, 2013

The United States Has So Many Laws, It's Impossible Not To Break Them

Contains Exclusive: Transcript Topics: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Mandeville, LA – Exclusive Transcript – John, when the law becomes so voluminous that it cannot be known, it cannot be enforced, by definition. Federalist Paper No. 61 written by James Madison, live it, love it, learn it. You’ll read all about Madison saying why the Necessary and Proper Clause must be used very cautiously and judiciously because you don’t want the creation of such a labyrinth of laws that no one can possibly know what it is, and therefore no one coul….Continue

Common Sense and rebuttals from listeners to the Mike Church Show

Tuesday, February 26th, 2013

This Day In Founding Fathers History - 26 February 2013

Contains Exclusive: Audio, Video Topics: , , , , , , , , , ,

This Day in Founding Founders History - Where we bring you important dates in the lives and history of the Founding Generation. In 1779 a letter was written to Thomas Paine, find out what it said in today's Founding Fathers History....….Continue

Members Only Access The Founders Pass

Exclusive Content & Discounts For Members Only

Benjamin Franklin Would

See All The Benefits That Await Take The Quick Tour Join

"It may seem to many readers that as I have elaborated my initial hypothesis I have step by step deprived myself of very nearly all possible argumentative allies. But is not just this required by the hypothesis itself? For if the hypothesis is true, it will necessarily appear implausible, since one way of stating part of the hypothesis is precisely to assert that we are in a condition which almost nobody recognizes and which perhaps nobody at all can recognize fully. If my hypothesis appeared initially plausible. it would certainly be false. And at least if even to entertain this hypothesis puts me into an antagonistic stance. it is a very different antagonistic stance from that of, for example, modern radicalism. For the modern radical is as confident in the moral expression of his stances and consequently in the assertive uses of the rhetoric of morality as any conservative has ever been. Whatever else he denounces in our culture he is certain that it still possesses the moral resources which he requires in order to denounce it. Everything else may be, in his eyes, in disorder; but the language of morality is in order. just as it is. That he too may be being betrayed by the very language he uses is not a thought available to him."  - Alastair MacIntyre

The Following Headlines Provided by NewsMax.com

Visit The Founders Tradin' Post