RSS

Mike Church

Official Talk Show Host News, History & Opinion For The Liberty-MindedHeard Daily on SiriusXM's Patriot ch 125, 6-9 am

Topic: Lakota Sioux

Constitution of US COOL banner

Tuesday, February 26th, 2013

The Commerce Clause And Sovereign Indian Nations

Contains Exclusive: Transcript Topics: , , , , , , , , ,

Mandeville, LA – Exclusive Transcript – Article I, Section 8, granting Congress to regulate commerce with foreign nations and among the several states and with the Indian tribes, why wouldn’t Congress just assert the exact same power and authority that they exert over the states if the Indian tribes decided to put new refineries up because they were on their reservations? Check out today’s transcript for the rest…….Continue

Monday, October 1st, 2012

How Do You Run Against ObamaClaus & Win The Parasite Vote?

Topics: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The once "slam dunk" pick up of the US Senate for Republicans is now in doubt as the War Party struggles to find its ground game after Bush TIC: Brad Birzer reminds us that "The Founders" never intended or thought their Constitutional Union was absolutely permanent How do you run against Santa (or ObamaClaus) Claus and win in Parasite rich Ohio!? And just HOW does ObamaClaus find all those goodies to shower the masses with!? Why he borrows them from Bernanke or the Chinese of ….Continue

Members Only Access The Founders Pass

Exclusive Content & Discounts For Members Only

Benjamin Franklin Would

See All The Benefits That Await Take The Quick Tour Join

"It may seem to many readers that as I have elaborated my initial hypothesis I have step by step deprived myself of very nearly all possible argumentative allies. But is not just this required by the hypothesis itself? For if the hypothesis is true, it will necessarily appear implausible, since one way of stating part of the hypothesis is precisely to assert that we are in a condition which almost nobody recognizes and which perhaps nobody at all can recognize fully. If my hypothesis appeared initially plausible. it would certainly be false. And at least if even to entertain this hypothesis puts me into an antagonistic stance. it is a very different antagonistic stance from that of, for example, modern radicalism. For the modern radical is as confident in the moral expression of his stances and consequently in the assertive uses of the rhetoric of morality as any conservative has ever been. Whatever else he denounces in our culture he is certain that it still possesses the moral resources which he requires in order to denounce it. Everything else may be, in his eyes, in disorder; but the language of morality is in order. just as it is. That he too may be being betrayed by the very language he uses is not a thought available to him."  - Alastair MacIntyre

The Following Headlines Provided by NewsMax.com

Visit The Founders Tradin' Post