RSS

Mike Church

Official Talk Show Host News, History & Opinion For The Liberty-MindedHeard Daily on SiriusXM's Patriot ch 125, 6-9 am

Topic: Michael Louis Seidman

rethinking-500x755

Thursday, January 3rd, 2013

Even The English Knew The Constitution Made Secession Legal

Topics: , , , ,

Mandeville, LA - Written by Mike Church - A recent temper tantrum made its way onto the editorial pages of the NY Times by Louis Michael Seidman, a man claiming to be a professor of Constitutional Law at Georgetown University titled "Let's Give Up on the Constitution". What Lincoln Killed Preview: President Jefferson Approves of the Northern States Seceding In this dystopian view of the founding of our current union turned mobocracy, Seidman points to Americans' alleged devoti….Continue

Audio Preview

Want The Full Version?

Become A Founders Pass Member

  • Benefits Include:
  • The Full Version Of This File! For Liberty's Sake, Instant Access Guaranteed
  • Forever Discount 15% Discount On All MikeChurch.com Products
  • 600+ Premium Video & Audio Files With More Added Weekly
  • Exclusive Video Chats With Mike Discuss Elections, Issues & More
  • There's More: Take A Tour Of Members Only Benefits

Join (less than .17 cents a day)

Members Only Access The Founders Pass

Exclusive Content & Discounts For Members Only

Benjamin Franklin Would

See All The Benefits That Await Take The Quick Tour Join

"It may seem to many readers that as I have elaborated my initial hypothesis I have step by step deprived myself of very nearly all possible argumentative allies. But is not just this required by the hypothesis itself? For if the hypothesis is true, it will necessarily appear implausible, since one way of stating part of the hypothesis is precisely to assert that we are in a condition which almost nobody recognizes and which perhaps nobody at all can recognize fully. If my hypothesis appeared initially plausible. it would certainly be false. And at least if even to entertain this hypothesis puts me into an antagonistic stance. it is a very different antagonistic stance from that of, for example, modern radicalism. For the modern radical is as confident in the moral expression of his stances and consequently in the assertive uses of the rhetoric of morality as any conservative has ever been. Whatever else he denounces in our culture he is certain that it still possesses the moral resources which he requires in order to denounce it. Everything else may be, in his eyes, in disorder; but the language of morality is in order. just as it is. That he too may be being betrayed by the very language he uses is not a thought available to him."  - Alastair MacIntyre

The Following Headlines Provided by NewsMax.com

Visit The Founders Tradin' Post