Writer • Producer • Narrator • Director
Mike Church Presents
The Road To Independence Pages of Independence
Solving The Mystery of Jefferson's Missing Original
Playing All Day - Independence Day - Free LIVE Stream
Click Here To Listen
Click Here To Purchase
RSS

Mike Church

Official Veritas Radio Network Talk Show Host News, History & Opinion For The Faith & Liberty-MindedHeard Daily on CRUSADE @ 8am CST

Topic: pirates

sugarcain_gaddafi-duck

Wednesday, January 9th, 2013

"If It Walks Like A Terrorist and Talks Like A Terrorist... Then It Must Be A Terrorist" -The CIA

Contains Exclusive: Transcript Topics: , , , , , , ,

Mandeville, LA - Exclusive Transcript - Just imagine the government and the agencies that have the attitude that if they have guns they’re up to no good and they have to be taken out. What if a drone is flying over some airspace in the middle of Montana and there’s a couple rancher dudes out there shooting cans off a log? They’ve got guns, too. “Hey, guns spotted out in a field in Montana. Get over here.” Why is it different? What would the material difference b….Continue

Jefferson_Change_LG banner

Thursday, October 25th, 2012

Jefferson Informs Congress of Pirates and ASKS Them What To Do

Contains Exclusive: Transcript Topics: , , , , , , ,

Mandeville, LA - Exclusive Transcript - I’m putting together a history of the Louisiana Purchase. The reason for it is because so many people are convinced that Jefferson was a hypocrite, and that he did not consult the Constitution and that the Louisiana Purchase was an unconstitutional act, therefore Jefferson was no friend to the Constitution. That is not true. That is not the case. The Louisiana Purchase was a correct use of presidential authority, and the Senate and….Continue

Upcoming Events

There are no upcoming events at this time.

Members Only Access The Founders Pass

Exclusive Content & Discounts For Members Only

Benjamin Franklin Would

See All The Benefits That Await Take The Quick Tour Join

"It may seem to many readers that as I have elaborated my initial hypothesis I have step by step deprived myself of very nearly all possible argumentative allies. But is not just this required by the hypothesis itself? For if the hypothesis is true, it will necessarily appear implausible, since one way of stating part of the hypothesis is precisely to assert that we are in a condition which almost nobody recognizes and which perhaps nobody at all can recognize fully. If my hypothesis appeared initially plausible. it would certainly be false. And at least if even to entertain this hypothesis puts me into an antagonistic stance. it is a very different antagonistic stance from that of, for example, modern radicalism. For the modern radical is as confident in the moral expression of his stances and consequently in the assertive uses of the rhetoric of morality as any conservative has ever been. Whatever else he denounces in our culture he is certain that it still possesses the moral resources which he requires in order to denounce it. Everything else may be, in his eyes, in disorder; but the language of morality is in order. just as it is. That he too may be being betrayed by the very language he uses is not a thought available to him."  - Alastair MacIntyre