RSS

Mike Church

Official Talk Show Host News, History & Opinion For The Liberty-MindedHeard Daily on SiriusXM's Patriot ch 125, 6-9 am

Topic: sesame street

church doc thumbnail

Thursday, October 11th, 2012

What do PBS Supporters Think We Are? Unified Thinking, Chinese Communists!?

Contains Exclusive: Video Topics: , , , , , ,

In last week’s presidential Debate, Mitt Romney famously promised to “eliminate any agency or program we have to fund by borrowing money from China”. This include PBS and Big Bird. Romney’s test for Federal survival is much ballyhooed by “conservatives” who aren’t very “conservative” these days. If you need a test for whether or not to fund something Governor, try looking it up in here. If it doesn’t appear in an enumerated power than regardless of what Jac….Continue

obama-big-bird banner

Wednesday, October 10th, 2012

Would You Re-Elect A President Whose Focus is On A Muppet?

Contains Exclusive: Audio, Video Topics: , , , , , , ,

Mandeville, LA - Exclusive Video and Audio - If Obama's focus is going to be on a Muppet, why would anyone want to re-elect him? There's too many other important issues (like the economy and jobs) that we should be focusing on, that this new ad is nothing more than a distraction. Yeah, Romney was the one who originally brought Big Bird up, but Obama is the one who is beating the dead horse... or bird.….Continue

Audio Preview

Want The Full Version?

Become A Founders Pass Member

  • Benefits Include:
  • The Full Version Of This File! For Liberty's Sake, Instant Access Guaranteed
  • Forever Discount 15% Discount On All MikeChurch.com Products
  • 600+ Premium Video & Audio Files With More Added Weekly
  • Exclusive Video Chats With Mike Discuss Elections, Issues & More
  • There's More: Take A Tour Of Members Only Benefits

Join (less than .17 cents a day)

Members Only Access The Founders Pass

Exclusive Content & Discounts For Members Only

Benjamin Franklin Would

See All The Benefits That Await Take The Quick Tour Join

"It may seem to many readers that as I have elaborated my initial hypothesis I have step by step deprived myself of very nearly all possible argumentative allies. But is not just this required by the hypothesis itself? For if the hypothesis is true, it will necessarily appear implausible, since one way of stating part of the hypothesis is precisely to assert that we are in a condition which almost nobody recognizes and which perhaps nobody at all can recognize fully. If my hypothesis appeared initially plausible. it would certainly be false. And at least if even to entertain this hypothesis puts me into an antagonistic stance. it is a very different antagonistic stance from that of, for example, modern radicalism. For the modern radical is as confident in the moral expression of his stances and consequently in the assertive uses of the rhetoric of morality as any conservative has ever been. Whatever else he denounces in our culture he is certain that it still possesses the moral resources which he requires in order to denounce it. Everything else may be, in his eyes, in disorder; but the language of morality is in order. just as it is. That he too may be being betrayed by the very language he uses is not a thought available to him."  - Alastair MacIntyre

The Following Headlines Provided by NewsMax.com

Visit The Founders Tradin' Post