The Mike Church Show World HQ
The Mike Church Show World HQ

Killing At Home Jobs Has Started “Mommy Wars”

Own your AUTOGRAPHED copy of THE book on the American Union's realignment
Own your AUTOGRAPHED copy of THE book on the American Union’s realignment

Mandeville, LA – Mike Church’s daily Pile of Prep, chock full of former at home jobs sparking “Mommy Wars”  plus other [r]epublican stories used to perform the Mike Church Show on Sirius/XM Patriot channel 125. “The conflict of 1861–1865 was not, as Lincoln said it was, a struggle to see if a modern republican state could survive, but a struggle to see if a vast union of federative republics could survive without the consolidation and consequent destruction of independent moral life that a dominant faction will inevitably seek to impose on the rest.” – Donald Livingston explaining Lincoln’s Destruction

New Secretary of State same as old (hag) Secretary of State: “We run the Middle East and will move our Stratego pieces around the board in any country we damn well please including Syria & Iran”

This Page is Supported by your Founders Pass subscriptions to this site, please take the tour and see all the GREAT CONTENT you are missing out on including Mike’s Project ’76 Webisodes™

Ron Paul returns: Paul wonders why two chicken hawks are mocking men who have actually served and have been awarded medals and what is so “sissy” about being cautious over starting a new war!?

Today’s Latin Phrase: “Pro virtute, felix temeritas” =Instead of valor, successful rashness

Cue up the leitmotif and prepare for… The Mommy Wars: Kathleen Parker dares to dish our cold reality to a cold reality resistent, feminist dominated world and the fact that at home jobs cannot be relied upon in the real world

Conservatisms WKRaP attempts at journalism are fantastical, hyperbolic, sensation and for the most part embarrassingly poorly researched and noted (which the Libs do too but they have the cover of major networks)

The DEA strikes back: Former “drug control agents” rally OBAMA Admin to “nullify” marijuana laws before they can go into effect – a perversion of Jefferson’s “Resolutions” of 1798 of the highest most impolitic order, methinks

The Stupid Party rides again (kinda like an Apple Dumpling gang movie!) as NRO Editor Ramesh Ponnoru cannot figure out why some are upset at McCain, Cruz et cetera for vilifying Hagel!

Own What Lincoln Killed -EPISODE I on CD today-Mike's hysterical and accurate tale of what Jefferson & company thought our government under the Constitution should look and act like
Own What Lincoln Killed -EPISODE I on CD today-Mike’s hysterical and accurate tale of what Jefferson & company thought our government under the Constitution should look and act like

Lincoln’s assault on the American tradition of secession and decentralized power is chronicled by Donald Livingston of “Rethinking The American Union For 21st Century” fame

VIDEO: Raising your personal debt limit as a personal finance matter shows how ridiculous the Government’s course is

For WHAT purpose do we need all the ballyhooed “military preparedness” our DeceptiCON and Wilsonian war mongers keep yammering about!? To fight a WWII style war against whom? Al Queda?

But we LIKE war! because Americas have not/will not read Sun Tzu and learn how to win wars without actually fighting them

From our “You are kidding right! No one is dumb enough to actually suggest that!” file comes this howitzer of a story describing how NASCAR may ask drivers to not “shoot air pistols in celebration” at this weekends NRA classic!

Ding Dong the wicked…. Hugo Chavez has died and now the world wonders just what sort of replacement madman the Venezuelans will elect/be subjugated by

Here is a sampling of what “anarcho libertarians” are saying about the demise of “Saint” Hugo Chavez

American Psycho – AG Holder says he CAN imagine a scenario under which American citizens, on American soil are taken out by a drone without due process… and so it begins

Mommy Wars II – David Frum is actually…wait for it… correct? Well, the “conservative” blogger presents a pretty solid case for why women should NOT be granted combat roles

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
About the author

Host of the Mike Church Show on The Veritas Radio Network's CRUSADE Channel & Founder of the Veritas Radio Network. Formerly, of Sirius/XM's Patriot channel 125. The show began in March of 2003 exclusively on Sirius and remains "the longest running radio talk show in satellite radio history".

Related Posts

1 Response
  1. Duane Cunnningham

    Mike

    Women in combat? I served many years active duty Navy, and then the Army Guard while in college. I wish to apply my experince working with women in the service, and as a conservative, so please give feedback as I apply my reasoning. I am your student…

    For the most part the female officers I served under were equals in professionalism to anyone else serving. Mayve less so for the enlisted ranks, but as a generality, males and females would perform similarly in MOST situations. However, one must consider some issues in physcial strenght, and stature. I have experienced this in the military with women, and their physical fitness levels, and physical abilities. With politicians pushing for political correctness, and feminization of the force, there have been effects on the military. For example, while in the Navy, women’s physical fitness standards where lower then men (less push ups, situps, or slower running times). I saw many examples of women who could not flake out a hose or carry heavy damage controll equipment when needed. This was compensated for my men general. Not to say they are not men who where overweight or out of shape and could not perform as well, or women that would be able to do so, but women where enabled to not have to do as much, as their standards were lower when it came to fitness. This may not be as much of a problem on a large ship or unit where there are others to compensate. Or with the female officer corps having a higher level of professionalism, and drive, so as my experience, they performed very well.
    To consider women in combat units or even special forces, is a scary proposition. The differences must be addressed. My experience is that of LOWER physical fitness standards which enable a an acceptable lowered capability, the males will have to do more, and carry a larger burden. To be clear, with a history of allowing for lower female physical fitness standards, why would it be different now? So we put women in combat units who have on average 50% less muscle mass then men, and allow for them to not be required to keep the SAME standard as men. That is not equality. An infantryman must be able to carry a lot of stuff on his back for himself, and FOR THE TEAM, as the others in the TEAM must count on him (or her). To allow a woman in a role, but let her do less, or be less able and then say it is equality is not logical, ethical, or morale . It will lessen the ability of the unit to perform. ONLY if standards are kept high, and that women will have to meet those standards will it not effect the ability of the combat team. So women will have to have the same requirements as males, without lowering the standards to allow women to get into a situation that is detremental to the combat unit.
    History and experience shows us that this is not the case. The standards have been allowed to be lower in the past, so why would it be different now?
    I have one other issue, which is about selective service. As a point to feminsit, if all being equal, and the physical standards for combat units are not lowered, should we require then that females register for selective service? Why are not the feminist clamoring for this? Would it not signify equality? In 1979, wasn’t there a SCOTUS decision that did not allow for female selective service based on the combat exclusion? As there was such as decision, would it now stand that feminist would now want selective service for all women, and a possibilty of the draft, now that they can be in combat units? If women want equality, they should have it.. but I do not see this as about equality…

Leave a Reply

Become a CRUSADER Today!

SUPPORT THE MIKE CHURCH SHOW
AND BECOME A PREMIUM MEMBER TODAY!
CHOOSE A MONTHLY SUPPORT LEVEL
$9.00 Basic Founders Pass
$16.67 PREMIUM Founding Brother
$49.99 PREMIUM Founding Father

GO PREMIUM FOR 30 DAYS FREE!

Click for 30 days FREE of the Mike Church Show

Listen To The KingDude Every Day on SubscribeStar!

Signup for Mike’s Daily [r]epublican Newsletter

Subscribe: Red Pill Diary Podcast

Scroll Up